Superuseless Superpowers February 19, 2009Posted by yakshi in comics, comix, cyborgs.
Tags: cyborgs, superheroes, superpowers
add a comment
My friend forwarded me a link to a blog called Superuseless Superpowers <http://superuseless.blogspot.com/>. By using comedy, the entries help to humanize the concept of superheroes. Whereas our culture idolizes superheroes and their superhuman abilities, this blog assigns unremarkable “superuseless superpowers” to regular people. For example, their superheroes can grow hair between their eyebrows extremely fast, or fly only while on a plane. Each entry is a different superpower, providing numerous, often disappointing, ideas for superheroes.
This blog raises the question of what qualities make a superhero so super and powerful. Is there a hierarchy amongst superheroes, even ones that have long been institutionalized in our pop culture? Superheroes surpass the notion of natural strength, therefore how can we compare the physical power of Iron Man’s impenetrable suit to the Hulk and his involuntary mutations? Either way, all superheroes have qualities that challenge social norms and natural human abilities. Is being superhuman ultimately better than being just human?
As we consider narratives behind superheroes, and how they involve the application of superpowers and qualities to regular people, we must address cyborgs. In what way are cyborgs, in some respects science’s attempt to improve the human body and mind, also better than humans? Could their physiological and psychological differences be considered superpowers, or rather superimprovements? How would cyborgs fit into the hierarchy of superheroes, if at all?
Comment on loss of dimension January 29, 2009Posted by jr4024 in art, comix.
Tags: dimension, kabuki
add a comment
Bailey’s comment was very insightful. When she mentioned about the copier creating a loss of a dimension, she made me think about my creative project that I did on Kabuki Vol. 1 last semester. For those of you who were not in the class, I took poster board and created a “zoomed in” chess board. In each square, there was a collage. After I made it, I took pictures so that I can keep it on my computer and I noticed that it looked different. It did not give the project its justice, its creativity. Even though it showed exactly what was on the board, there were intricacies such as the papers on top of each other and the material that atre important to consider as well. The color especially has great significance. However, I do feel that we need to appreciate this technology of printing because artist/writers’ works do not have to worry about “rotting away.” I also think that the book of songs gives the Blake’s work another chance to be seen, analyzed, critiqued, discussed, etc. These types of things, although not the real pieces of work, can allow the distribution to gain a new level.